#foswiki 2014-12-30,Tue

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
***ChanServ sets mode: +o gac410 [00:29]
......... (idle for 42mn)
GithubBot[distro] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/OfON7Q
distro/master 0542c1c George Clark: Item2144: Document Foswiki::Func::getRequestObject()
[01:11]
***GithubBot has left [01:11]
........ (idle for 35mn)
GithubBot[distro] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/Mxc2Ng
distro/master d9b094e George Clark: Item12753: Implement URLPARAM for search topic=...
[01:46]
***GithubBot has left [01:46]
GithubBot[distro] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/NoGM7w
distro/master 20992c4 George Clark: Item12450: clean up references to old project
[01:53]
***GithubBot has left [01:53]
................ (idle for 1h17mn)
GithubBot[distro] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/5cO7xA
distro/master d788c30 George Clark: Item11353: Don't create TOC entries for HTML comments...
[03:10]
***GithubBot has left [03:10]
......................... (idle for 2h0mn)
gac410 has left [05:10]
........................ (idle for 1h56mn)
loolooWhy is my %FORMFIELD% Macro appending the containing web to the Form Field Value?
Its a text field
ooooo
figured it out
had noautolink on in one we
web*
and auotlink on in the other
and it was trying to make autolinks, but the other web wasn't having it
[07:06]
........................................................................... (idle for 6h12mn)
***ChanServ sets mode: +o gac410 [13:20]
dccunhaHi, I had installed theses tree plugins via debian package: CalendarPlugin, DateTimePlugin and ExcelImportExportPlugin. Happen that the user that run foswiki wasn't able to find then due to file permissions problems. I installed then in a fresh system.
Once the file permissions set, every thing work fine.
[13:34]
gac410Disclaimer ... I don't use the debian packages, But i"ve heard that some of the packages have ownership issues. [13:35]
dccunhagac410: indeed they have
So I try to found the debian source packages or some guidelines to package development but I fail. Where I can find those? I would to fix this
[13:36]
gac410http://foswiki.org/Tasks/Item10954 is another extension with permission problems.
Hm Our debian package maintainer has been off doing other things. I don't build them so I don't really know how it all goes. I think there are two different autobuild tools tucked away in our repository
One of the builder tools is here: https://github.com/foswiki/distro/tree/master/core/tools/pkg/debian
SvenDowideit runs the autobuild of the packages. not sure what the status of that is now.
It looks like a lot of the scripts depend on subversion, which we shut down in August.
The debian pkgs were never an official part of our distribution. We build and release the zip/tar files. Various volunteers have generated the .deb / .rpm ... pkgs
[13:37]
dccunhaThanks for the advice, I will give a look at this [13:55]
gac410We could sure use some assistance in this area. The way things currently stand, we are entering the alpha/beta process for Foswiki 1.2.0, and I'm afraid the debian and rpm packages will be left in the dust.
Current tasks list against our Debian packages: http://foswiki.org/Tasks/DebianPackage
Ah.... Found the tools we are using for Release01x01. They are not in Master, but in the Release01x01 branch it appears.
https://github.com/foswiki/distro/tree/Release01x01/core/tools/pkg/fosiki
That's Sven's tools
somewhere he also builds rpm's I have no idea what does that.
SvenDowideit: Are you sleeping ? (Probably considering the hour in Australia)
[13:56]
***ChanServ sets mode: +o Lynnwood_ [14:04]
...... (idle for 29mn)
Lynnwoodgac410: good morning. Wanted to touch base with you regarding Tasks.Item11729 (Issues with WikiGroups topic…) [14:33]
gac410okay [14:34]
LynnwoodI haven’t revisited it in quite a while and so am not completely sure it’s still viable with other changes in the code, skin changes, etc.
I’m afriad i’m not set up to test it. (on list of resolutions for new year) ;-)
[14:34]
gac410yeah I'm just trying to find tasks with commits that are not "Waiting for Release". We have a lot of tasks dangling without formal conclusion we need to resolve for 1.2
For each task, either we need to close, set waiting for release, or evaluate if we need to revert it.
[14:35]
LynnwoodIf there were remaining problems with this, would it have shown up?
I did incorporate the feedback Micha had.
[14:36]
gac410No idea. Hopefully Michael would come across them but I think most of his systems use ldap. So not really sure.
If he's happy and you're happy, I'm happy :)
[14:37]
LynnwoodWhat would be the preferred testing for this at this point. I can easily test it against new 1.1.9 install and with some work i could test it against trunk.
that first sentence was a question...
[14:39]
gac410hm. I'm mostly worried about trunk. Is that checkin in Release01x01 too?
hm. not according to the task checkins.
I'm not sure what's best. If you can check it out on http://trunk.foswiki.org/ that's one way.
Or if you are reasonably sure it's okay, set it "Waiting for release" and hopefully issues will shake out during alpha/beta.
I'm afraid that there are a lot of tasks that will end up going that route.
[14:40]
Lynnwoodok
i’ll do that but also plan to revisit it after new year.
[14:42]
gac410That's fine. We are going to try to push towards 1.2 beta at the 1st release meeting of 2015
I need to write a query for all tasks with checkins that are not in Closed or Waiting for Release state. Then review them all :P
Previously I've audited the svn commit log making sure every commit had a task in releasable state. But for trunk, over the past 4-5 years, that is wayyy to much work.
[14:44]
..... (idle for 22mn)
Lynnwoodjeez… that would be a task. [15:08]
gac410yeah. Just the bumps between 1.1.x versions have been really painful.
That and also needing to look for issues where trunk <-> release merges didn't happen.
[15:09]
........ (idle for 35mn)
Tarbox1How is "protect on save" tracked in the Wysiwyg? [15:45]
gac410Tarbox1: not sure. It probably adds a special Class, and then saves it in a <sticky> block ? [15:47]
Tarbox1Then what's the difference between protect on save and protect forever? [15:47]
gac410Oh.... never mind. I guess that's protect forever. hm...
I guess I'd have to try it. Probably a different class, but not really sure.
[15:48]
Tarbox1Finally found it in the debugger.
<span class="WYSIWYG_PROTECTED"></span> which I guess it strips out after the fact.
[15:48]
................................................................................................ (idle for 7h56mn)
GithubBot[FoswikiOrgPlugin] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/RmLKxg
FoswikiOrgPlugin/master 3483cb2 George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec issues
[23:45]
***GithubBot has left [23:45]
GithubBot[distro] gac410 pushed 2 new commits to master: http://git.io/ryZjLw
distro/master b86df56 George Clark: Item13180: Using Foswiki::Sandbox breaks bootstrap...
distro/master 831bb1a George Clark: Item12381: Review Config.spec files...
[23:47]
***GithubBot has left [23:47]
GithubBot[CharsetConverterContrib] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/ubaCMg
CharsetConverterContrib/master 7c3a78d George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:49]
***GithubBot has left [23:49]
GithubBot[DBIStoreContrib] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/0N-soA
DBIStoreContrib/master 04e11b0 George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:50]
***GithubBot has left [23:50]
GithubBot[DirectedGraphPlugin] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/AgWDoA
DirectedGraphPlugin/master fe825ee George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:51]
***GithubBot has left [23:51]
GithubBot[EmptyContrib] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/VIgiPA
EmptyContrib/master 0e1fe91 George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:52]
***GithubBot has left [23:52]
GithubBot[FormPlugin] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/778F-g
FormPlugin/master 0d18bb8 George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:53]
***GithubBot has left [23:53]
GithubBot[FortunePlugin] gac410 pushed 2 new commits to master: http://git.io/V6LOUw
FortunePlugin/master 2b4361e George Clark: Item13117: Fix up spec file....
FortunePlugin/master 55eb26b George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:55]
***GithubBot has left [23:55]
GithubBot[LogDispatchContrib] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/9cgzYw
LogDispatchContrib/master f91337b George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:56]
***GithubBot has left [23:56]
GithubBot[NewUserPlugin] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/2jm7FQ
NewUserPlugin/master b05a0b7 George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:57]
***GithubBot has left [23:57]
GithubBot[PerlPlugin] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/bMiaFw
PerlPlugin/master b180197 George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:58]
***GithubBot has left [23:58]
GithubBot[TablesContrib] gac410 pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/5HHgMA
TablesContrib/master fe805cc George Clark: Item12381: Config.spec review
[23:58]
***GithubBot has left [23:58]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)